![]() If you see my comment, I even asked the user to not to post duplicate questions. I marked as a dupe of this one: How to delete entries and video files in a listview file browser?, which is an exact copy from the same unregistered user. To prevent duplicate answers on duplicate questions, what about punishing those who answer the duplicates even when the "possible duplicate of." comment is there?Īn example is this question: How to delete entry and video file in a listview file browser?. The main issue I believe are the scattered answers on all those dupes. I would say it's worth trying it and see what the results are. Reducing the clutter is enough reward to me, but perhaps it's not for others. I do it because duplicate questions are annoying. I do not vote to close a question for any reward. And if it's not automatic, the democratic community will is gonna sort it out. Putting just a few such rules into place kinda makes penalties redundant, I'd say. Let every voting-eligible user have like, dunno, 10 such votes per day.To encourage suggesting case-specific or harder-to-find and most-exact duplicates. Exempt highly/well-known duplicates from being eligible though.Hand out a few points ( +2 or +0.5 whenever clicked.). ![]() Next to each user that proposed a link.Introduce a subtle ▲ button in the "marked as duplicate by …" box.If we want to reward helpful duplicate suggestions, then it'll likely only work out if it was implemented as UI gimmick. The benefit here is coming closer to obtain the badge thingy that's available (?) for high flag weight. And someone who correctly closevotes most of the time will also have a higher probability of correctly flagging. That's a proper moderation feature after all. People are still obsessed with that, right? So give them +1 flag weight for correct closevotes. Instead of rewarding with score, benefit closevoters with flag weight. Obsolete counter-proposal: Keep the reputation system and moderation separated. +0.25 at the NY StackExchange.įlag-Weight (not a thing anymore, or is it?) Yes! Why not use floats for our virtual internet money? Let a closevote trade for e.g. The rewards should be minuscule for a start. If implemented, then it should really be slowly. However such a feature change would never go back in the bottle. (Also: not all duplicates are bad duplicates.) It would certainly spur more closevoting, but won't fix the problems of our nightshift. I believe the potential reward and the penalties are too low in any case. Being able to propose one's own answers as duplicates is both a recipe for abuse to rep addicts, or worse yet: a deterrent for modest posters.(And for vague questions only the OP can ever conclude if a duplicate really fits. The interpretation of exact duplicateness is susceptible to moon phases.The moderation system and reputation feature should stay separate (that was the conclusion from the previous discussions).Unfairly benefits users which already have >3000 rep over newcomers.(And the more recent dupehammer of course). But it's discussion-worthy in light of all the feature and moderation enhancements over the years. If you think -5 is too much of a punishment: -2 might work as well, although I really think there should be a harsh punishment on an unfair dupe-closing. If you think +10 is too high a reward: Consider that finding a duplicate can often be more work than writing an answer, and a correct answer usually nets you at least 10 points, if not much more. Everyone dupe-votes carelessly from time to time, so the threat of punishment needs to be present to keep everyone on their toes, just as the threat of downvoting does when you post an answer. Finding a good dupe is a work of love: You need to make sure you understand the OP's question, and you need to scan every potential duplicate for whether it really contains an answer that will help the OP. Punish everyone involved (dupe-finders and dupe-voters) with -5 points, and revoke all rep gained from the dupe-voting, if a question closed as duplicate gets reopened.Ī punishment for mis-voting is going to be controversial but in my eyes, it is absolutely essential. Reward each following closevoter who picks one of the previously suggested dupes with +2 points if the question gets closed. (The limitation is to avoid gaming by making frivolous suggestions when it's obvious that a question is going to get closed as a duplicate.) If multiple duplicates are found, reward all finders whose suggestion was voted for at least once by another user. Reward the finder of a duplicate with +10 points if the question gets closed as a dupe. Give an incentive for finding duplicate questions deals with various ways of rewarding the finding of duplicates, a tough and increasingly necessary janitorial task.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |